Under The Seville Agreement And Its Supplementary Measures The Lead Role Is

 
 

At the Council of Delegates in Seoul in 2005, the Seville Agreement was strengthened by the adoption of a series of “additional measures”. These complementary measures were used to strengthen the Seville agreement. These measures include measures to clarify the respective role of the Lead Agency and the host national society: 1.4. The coordination of movements within a management agency has only been operational if a satisfactory working relationship has been developed between the Host National Society, the ICRC and/or the International Federation. All other elements of an international operation should support increased participation and responsibility of the host company in the direction and coordination of the operation. How has the Seville agreement affected the red cross and Red Crescent`s efforts to change the movement`s cooperation? If anything wanted to test the Seville agreement, it was the Balkans, the largest integrated operation ever carried out by the movement. A rigorous external assessment recognized that the decision to establish a common administrative structure to deal with the regional dimension of the crisis has improved the response to humanitarian needs. 5.6.1 In situations where the needs of victims do not require an international assistance operation under the direction of a leading agency, a national society that provides direct assistance to the society of the country affected by conflict or disaster immediately informs the ICRC or the Federation. The agreement deals with active cooperation and not just on the division of labour between the components of the movement. It is a matter of using their different legal tasks and their complementary capacities in a cooperative way in order to achieve common goals. The words “Lead Agency” and “Lead Role” made one of the main clarifications in Seville. For each operation, one component would be the lead agency and the coordination of the activities of others. But leadership roles would also be recognized – the ICRC, which is working to restore family ties in the Federation`s operation in India, or the Federation`s support for the institutional development of the Palestinian Red Crescent in an ICRC-led operation.

This approach was clearly in the interests of recipients and recognized that they have a right to expect a rapid and effective response to their needs, but it also reflects the growing demand for donor accountability. This agreement is more than an operational management instrument or a statement of intent. It initiates a profound change in attitude between members of the same movement: the adoption of a collaborative spirit in which each member of the movement appreciates the contributions of other members as partners in a global humanitarian enterprise.

Comments are closed

Sorry, but you cannot leave a comment for this post.